Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:17
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
4 foods that can lower blood pressure naturally, according to a top cardiologist - Times of India
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The Director Of Final Fantasy Tactics Gets Political - Kotaku
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
What was something inappropriate a member of your family caught you doing?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
The Witcher 4 is being developed with a ‘console-first’ mindset, CDPR devs say - Polygon
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
An Optometrist Is Begging People To Stop This Common Habit ASAP - AOL.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
What is the message of Ex Machina?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.